Vaibhav Srivastava
B.Tech - Electronics and Communication
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
IAS classes
I had joined the classes a few days later than the start of the batch and so lagged a few topics. Just a few months back,I was in the electronics lab getting frustated in between the LEDs and the non-working compnents of the entire lab. And now I am here with non-working components of mine memory cells.
Next class, immediately after History, started the human anatomy and all the aspects of human reproduction system, nervous system, skeltal system and the blood groups were taught within 2 hours. And don't go over the words Two hours : It was worthy of a detailed whole day lecture.
The very thing is that there is really no limit to what an IAS officer knows. He has in depth contribution in medical, economical, social, technical and all those aspects of life and society that you can imagine of. Not elongating much, What I feel now is that I should end this right here and start mugging up the day history. Good Bye for now.
Enjoy :)
Friday, April 9, 2010
Freshers to Farewell
Sunday, February 21, 2010
अब क्या कहें ये क़िस्सा पुराना बहुत हुआ
ढलती न थी किसी भी जतन से शब-ए-फ़िराक़
ऐ मर्ग-ए-नागहाँ तेरा आना बहुत हुआ
हम ख़ुल्द से निकल तो गये हैं पर ऐ ख़ुदा
इतने से वाक़ये का फ़साना बहुत हुआ
अब हम हैं और सारे ज़माने की दुश्मनी
उससे ज़रा रब्त बढ़ाना बहुत हुआ
अब क्यों न ज़िन्दगी पे मुहब्बत को वार दें
इस आशिक़ी में जान से जाना बहुत हुआ
अब तक तो दिल का दिल से तार्रुफ़ न हो सका
माना कि उससे मिलना मिलाना बहुत हुआ
Friday, February 5, 2010
Gandhi - Did He really exist any time ? I doubt...
"Generations to come, it may well be, will scarce believe that such a man as this one ever in flesh and blood walked upon this Earth."
I don't know of you , but for myself , I am helpless. For me , anyone of the name Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi is just as imaginabile as the mythological characters of any religion . We personify such people on the basis of thier description given in the books which in turn are the reflections of the mindset of the authors.We have the complete epic Ramayana , which describes the character of Sri Ram as the ideal man.In the way of these descriptions , certain incriptions are there to define the expected behaviour of how an ideal world ahould be.Now how is all these stuffs related to the topic ???
The underlying explanation is in fact a question. Have we stated and broadcasted the Gandhian principles in the same way as they were in the mind of the originator. There have been several approaches to the meanings of those principles.There have been numerous books,magazine articles , movies and God knows what-what over this Gandhigiri. Everyone has added His/Her own intellectual in defining these principles.They all are an appreciable effort.But much in the same way that the mythological characters are not acceptable to our minds, such principles also become out of human acceptance - or in better terms , the situational acceptence.At least in the current scenario of the world,it becomes really very tough to belive that such actions took place in anytime of the history.It can never be a single platform effort in the society to make such things possible.We have to make seriously large scale efforts for developing a society which the Gandhian principles dreamt of , and such a sytem's existence would only had made the principles come true.That is the thing that's going out of the brain.
How come he achieved all that ? Did he really achieve that ? If such things had ever ever been in action , why we are so exhausted in making efforts for achieving it ? Either they were wrong who described such things , or we are wrong in making the efforts.People who have seen Gandhi , they are stillalive , so the former one is obviously true that Gandhiji lived , He existed once. Now what becomes the second obvious thing is that , we are wrong.
Just making movies , or writing articles or posting on blogs ( like me ) will not do the thing. We will have to be honest with our individual efforts.We will have to have the feeling that when He can , why not I ? I f we get frustated with the system , there are many examples who have revolted against it. Now when we can revolt for a personal cause , why not we may revolt for a social cause too . When it comes on ourself , we can cross any boundaries . Why those boundaries become so strong in social cause where the opposite should have occured. Anyone can do it anytime .Think of ittttt .
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Regionalism
“All the others whether majority or minority who cannot compete and win, they create silly causes such as Regionalism, Religionalism and casteism.”
– Charles Darwin (The theory of evolution).
Globalism is out, regionalism is in, despite a bad rap from some pragmatists who say it could lead to a world of hostile trade blocs. On the other hand, it might just be a needed source of dynamism that can further economic integration. Like "globalization" in the 1980s, "regionalism" has become the buzzword of the 1990s. But regionalism is a term that is overused and widely misunderstood.
Almost anyone who writes or talks about business today has something to say about how we are lurching, drifting, or dashing toward regionalism. Globalization, although no one could define it, was generally regarded as positive. But views on regionalism are much more divided. Some say regionalism results in the fragmentation of markets and countries, that it arises from resurgent tribalism and leads to a world of hostile trade blocs. Others, however, argue that regional trading arrangements, such as the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement or the North American Free Trade Agreement, are a desperately needed source of dynamism in today's global economy, and that inhibitions to further economic integration can best be overcome at regional levels.
As Humpty Dumpty said in "Through the Looking-Glass," "When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less." The answer depends on what we mean by regionalism. Regionalism if is healthy then it could start a competition that would fuel development. But the underline is that competition needs to be healthy. E.g. If New Delhi can switch to clean fuel and control pollution then the question arises, 'Why not my city?'. If worked systematically more cities can be cleaner. Regionalism doesn’t mean only to divide the states and cities into boundaries of common interests and personal means.
If we talk of our own nation , the formation of states along linguistic and ethnic lines has occurred in India in numerous instances since independence in 1947. There have been demands, however, to form units within states based not only along linguistic, ethnic, and religious lines but also, in some cases, on a feeling of the distinctness of a geographical region and its culture and economic interests. The most volatile movements are those ongoing in Jammu and Kashmir and Punjab). How the central government responds to these demands will be an area of scrutiny through the late 1990s and beyond. It is believed by some officials that conceding regional autonomy is less arduous and takes less time and fewer resources than does meeting agitation, violence, and demands for concessions.. For all this we must have strong and sensible center government.
Quoting from a recent news article in Times - “Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray's recent outburst against Bollywood star Amitabh Bachchan's loyalty towards his native place (Uttar Pradesh) has raised several eyebrows. While it drew strong retaliation by Jaya Bachchan and Amar Singh, many objected to Thackeray's opposition to the celebration of Uttar Bharatiya Diwas and Chhath Puja in Maharashtra. Barely a day after clashes between supporters of Raj Thackeray and Samajwadi Party workers in Mumbai, two unidentified youths threw bottles at Bachchans’ residence in Mumbai.”